“Australia does take a different view. We accept the reality of climate change.” said Penny Wong, Australia’s underwhelmingly ineffective foreign minister yesterday. That’s classic Orwellian language right there. Penny, there is no “reality of climate change”, because there in no anthropogenic climate change, no matter how many times you assert that it exists in your alternate universe, which I’m sure it does, along with men can be women and we’re all the same species. The woman is a fraud in my opinion.
After Trump got up at the UN yesterday and verbally evicerated the entire rotten stinking house of cards and grift that it is, predictably the brain dead zombies of the western “communism lite” nations were quick to declare that Trump was inherently wrong about almost everything he said. On the the ABC they went as far as to say that Trump was “Denying Climate Change.”
That’s another favorite of these demon possessed lost souls. Twist the very language itself to make somebody look like that their stated position is insane. You may as well say Trump denies gravity, because when you use language like that you’ve already positioned yourself as the source of an irrefutable truth. Anyone who disagrees is a “truth denier” because you are the keeper of the truth. It’s a typical shitty, low life progressive, cheap parlor trick which doesn’t fool anyone. They did ths during the fake pandemic. People were labeled “vaccine deniers”. We all know how that worked out, except the holy “truth keepers”, of course. They’re carrying on to this day, screaming about fucking Tylenol and pregnant women. “Trump’s not a doctor, he’s an idiot, blah blah blah.”
I am forgotten
This morning I watched the King of Spain blather on at the UN about every progressive issue that is in existence today. He may have even invented some new “complaints”.* Open borders are great, diversity equity, inclusion, climate change is a threat etc etc. None of this affects this guy, by the way. It’s good to be king.
I’m sure Canada has the same position. It’s a turbo-progressive country after all on a death march of mass immigration, climate change wealth destruction and DEI woke maggotization of the people who founded it from the late 15th century onward. They have a climate change plan website. It’s populated with the usual goody two shoes targets and declarations. It’s like they all use the same simpering template. “Our plan to reduce 40-45% of emissions below 2005 levels by 2030. We are committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.” Good for you. The UN overlords won’t be leveling you this week. Good Job!
In New Zealand it appears they had the same fakakta government sponsored risk assessment plan as the Aussies. The (New Zealand) “risk assessment was carried out over nine months by a diverse, multi-disciplinary team led by AECOM, together with Tonkin and Taylor, the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) and others.” I’d put money on the fact that these storied institutions of science and research have used the same bullshit fossil fuel carbon malarkey calculations that their neighbors did across the Tasman.
They all use the same models. They all fall in line with the ponzi scheme called the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that the UN cooked up in 1988 to “provide policymakers with regular scientific assessments on the current state of knowledge about climate change.” It was never about the weather and always about bleeding wealthy western countries of their blood, sweat and tears while guilt tripping them about their economic success, and how the “emissions” were causing the sea to rise exclusively in third world countries. It is about taking from the rich and giving to the poor. The problem is that it has been so effective that entire industries have been established to keep this hoax going. It’s a grotesque, bloated criminal and immoral, barbaric monstrosity that doesn’t belong in a civilized world.
Good Day
*defiant and at times threatening
